Group Project 2

Discussion

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

8 pts

Relevant

The group discussion thoroughly addresses the provided questions, drawing clear and insightful connections between the reading materials, video, and the discussion topic. Relevant examples are provided to illustrate key points. The synopsis reflects a collaborative effort to develop solutions, rather than a summary of individual contributions

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

Partially Relevant

The group discussion addresses the questions but may lack depth or clarity in connecting the reading materials and video to the discussion topic. Some examples are provided, but they may not fully support the discussion. The synopsis shows some team collaboration but might lean more toward a summary of individual contributions.

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

Not Relevant

The discussion fails to address the provided questions or does so superficially. Little to no connection is made between the reading materials, video, and the discussion topic. The synopsis lacks evidence of collaborative problem-solving.

pts

8 pts

--

Edit criterion description

Citations and Writing

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

Full Credit

The group's written synopsis follows APA format and citation guidelines, including proper in-text citations and a comprehensive reference list. Writing is clear and correct.

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

Partial Credit

The group's written synopsis partially follows APA format and citation guidelines, with some errors in the in-text citations or the reference list. There may be a few issues with the writing's clarity or correctness.

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

No Credit

The group's written synopsis fails to follow APA format and citation guidelines, indicating a lack of understanding of proper citation practices. The overall writing quality significantly detracts from the reader's understanding of the discussion.

pts

4 pts

--

Edit criterion description

Meeting

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

Active Participation and Engagement

All group members attended the meeting and actively participated in the discussion. The group leader’s evaluation reflects a productive meeting where members contributed to the group’s goals.

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

Limited Participation and Engagement

Some group members attended the meeting but showed limited participation. The group leader’s evaluation indicates a need for improvement in engagement or coordination.

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

No Participation and Engagement

Group members failed to attend the meeting or make a significant contribution to the group discussion. The leader’s evaluation reflects a lack of collaboration.

pts

4 pts

--

Edit criterion description

Video

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

4 pts

Submitted to Standard

The group successfully created and submitted the recorded Zoom conference session. The recording is well-organized, clearly demonstrates group engagement, and follows the assignment instructions.

Edit rating Delete rating

2 pts

Submitted Below Standard

The group submitted a recording that is incomplete, poorly organized, or does not fully demonstrate group engagement in the discussion.

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

Not Submitted

The group did not submit the Zoom conference session recording or failed to follow the assignment instructions.

pts

4 pts

--

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

Description of criterion

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

Full Marks

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

No Marks

pts

5 pts

--

Group Project 2

Completion Prerequisites

Rubric

Rubric